American Medical News Spreads Frivolous Lawsuit Myth

Brett Emison
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 461
Visit Brett Emison on FacebookVisit Brett Emison on LinkedInVisit Brett Emison on TwitterVisit Brett Emison on AvvoVisit Brett Emison on Google+
Posted by Brett EmisonAugust 14, 2012 12:15 PM

The folks at American Medical News filed a report yesterday claiming that the Missouri Supreme Court decision, Watts v. Lester E. Cox Medical Centers, holding that non-economic damage caps for malpractice injury victims was unconstitutional would "lead to more frivolous lawsuits". The "news" source doubled-down and issued this tweet:

This tweet went not only to American Medical News' more than 25,000 followers, but has been retweeted by several others, including by Walter Olson at Overlawyered.

But the plain fact is that the non-economic damages cap struck down by the Supreme Court have absolutely nothing to do with preventing frivolous lawsuits. By definition, the damages caps can only apply to a case with merit and which the plaintiff not only wins, but has suffered and is awarded substantial non-economic damages.

In order to for the unconstitutional non-economic damage caps to apply, the following must occur:

(1) The jury must find the doctor, hospital, or other health care provider was liable for the injury (an actual cause in fact of the injury);

(2) The jury must find that the injured victim suffered some non-economic loss or injury (an incomplete list of non-economic damages include pain, suffering, mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of consortium, loss of care, loss of comfort, loss of support, lost enjoyment of life, etc.) that was caused by No. (1);

(3) The jury must find that the value of the injured victim's non-economic loss is greater than $350,000 over the victim's lifetime.

These unconstitutional caps have nothing to do with frivolous lawsuits and it is disingenuous and outright misleading for anyone to suggest otherwise.

While these caps don't restrict frivolous lawsuits, they do fundamentally restrict valid lawsuits and, instead of protecting innocent victims, these caps protect negligent doctors and hospitals from being held accountable and accepting responsibility for the damage they cause.

You can find other "tort reform" myths debunked here.

[More on Your 7th Amendment Rights]

[More on the Missouri Supreme Court's Decision Finding Non-Economic Injury Caps Unconstitutional]

(c) Copyright 2012 Brett A. Emison

Follow @BrettEmison on Twitter.

0 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments for this article are closed. You may still contact the author directly by email.

Subscribe to The Legal Examiner Kansas City

The Legal Examiner Kansas City RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

The Legal Examiner Kansas City is brought to you by Langdon & Emison

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Langdon & Emison (800) 397-4910 www.langdonemison.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Langdon & Emison tries cases across the country from offices in St. Louis and near Kansas City. Greater Kansas City areas include Kansas City, Independence, Lee's Summit, Blue Springs, Raytown, Gladstone, Liberty, Grandview, Belton, Sedalia, Warrensburg, Marshall, Raymore, Excelsior Springs.
911 Main StP.O. Box 220, Lexington, Missouri 64067 [ Show Map ]1828 Swift AveSuite 333, North Kansas City, Missouri 64116 [ Show Map ]110 East Lockwood, St. Louis, Missouri 63119 [ Show Map ]
Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address