07252017Headline:

Kansas City, Missouri

HomeMissouriKansas City

Email Brett Emison Brett Emison on LinkedIn Brett Emison on Twitter Brett Emison on Facebook Brett Emison on Avvo
Brett Emison
Brett Emison
Attorney • (800) 397-4910

Nevada Investigating Medical Device Relationship with Doctors

1 comment

The New York Times this week published a report that Nevada state officials have begun an investigation to determine if payments to cardiologists by a heart device company were legitimate consulting fees or inducements to the doctors for using its products. While not the first time this type of covert marketing of medical devices has been employed, the series of media reports that this has spawned will bring focused attention to the trend, and brings unwanted attention to the medical device brand Biotronik.

"Gov. Brian Sandoval on Monday asked state health officials to look into whether the dealings between the doctors and a company called Biotronik had involved improper billing practices or patient safety issues," the Times reports. "Last year, at one Las Vegas hospital where the cardiologists practiced, University Medical Center of Southern Nevada, 95 percent of the patients, or 250 of the 263 people who got a pacemaker or defibrillator, got a Biotronik device. Before becoming Biotronik consultants, those doctors, who belong to a practice called Nevada Heart and Vascular, apparently rarely, if ever, used its devices. Several experts on medical ethics said on Tuesday that the ties between the cardiologists, Biotronik and a distributor for the device maker called Western Medical raised both ethical and legal questions."

This Nevada inquiry follows a report in The New York Times that heart device specialists at a Las Vegas practice started using Biotronik implants in nearly all their patients in 2008 after company documents showed they became consultants to the device maker, getting up to $5,000 a month in fees. According to the governor’s spokeswoman, the Board of Medical Examiners for Nevada is also looking into the issue.

Nevada’s University Medical Center issued a statement in response to the inquiry, in which they said that Biotronik devices had performed very well and that patients had benefited since the facility adopted their use. The hospital first started using the devices in mid-2008, when it changed its contracting policies.

With the limited amount of testing required by the FDA, and with medical device safety often taking a back seat to profits, this latest piece of news should be disconcerting to those who want a clear division between medical products pushed by pharmaceutical interests and the medical professionals who are supposed to look after patients’ best interests. With blurring lines between the dissemination of medical information and marketing, injured consumers are the ones who would pay the ultimate price for that duplicity.

The Times article from Sunday focused on ties between a device industry sales official in Las Vegas named Caesar Fonte and Dr. Resh and his colleagues. Prior to mid-2008, when Mr. Fonte was at Guidant and later Boston Scientific after it acquired Guidant, he worked with the Las Vegas cardiologists who were then paid consultants to those companies. At that time, they largely used the devices Mr. Fonte represented.

But in mid-2008, the Times reports, Mr. Fonte quit Boston Scientific to start his own company called Western Medical that distributed Biotronik implants and other medical products. Virtually overnight, Dr. Resh and his partners became Biotronik consultants and shifted much of their business to it.

(c) Copyright 2011 Brett A. Emison

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. Pamela Egan says:
    up arrow

    If indeed the payments are an inducement for using these products in unnecessary ways or in unnecessary situations then there is a real problem here. That said, I will point out that a number of the major manufacturers/distributors of some medical devices as well as other medical equipment and supplies do offer incentives to vendors (and possibly other customers including physicians?) that are structured in such a way that if the customer’s purchase totals reach a certain figure during a 12-month period, the distributor would pay out what effectively is a rebate consisting of a considerable amount of money.

    I don’t know that that’s what is going on here or if it would even be appropriate to offer such incentives to physicians, but I just thought I’d throw it out there in case it does turn out to be a false alarm.