11222014Headline:

Kansas City, Missouri

HomeMissouriKansas City

Email Brett Emison Brett Emison on LinkedIn Brett Emison on Twitter Brett Emison on Facebook Brett Emison on Avvo Brett Emison on Google Plus
Brett Emison
Brett Emison
Attorney • (866) 735-1102 Ext 461

Did You Know… Railroad Companies Are Fighting Safety Improvements?

3 comments

Railroad companies are fighting against PTC railroad safety improvementsAccording to the U.S. Department of Transportation, some 40% of railroad accidents are caused by human error. Starting in 1990, to mitigate these human error accidents, the NTSB put a new system called “Positive Train Control” or PTC on its Most Wanted List of Transportation Safety Improvements. Positive Train Control is a system that will automatically apply the brakes on trains that are about to collide or enter the wrong track, and includes train separation or collision avoidance; line speed enforcement; temporary speed restrictions; and rail worker wayside safety. The system was designed to reduce the number of human errors that lead to train collisions and derailments that cause injuries, deaths and hazmat spills.

After the September 2008 California accident in which a Metrolink train ran a red light and collided head-on with a Union Pacific freight train, Congress passed the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008. This bill set a deadline of 2015 for implementation of PTC across some 70,000 miles of America’s rail network. The bill was signed by into law by President Bush in October 2008.

Now, less than four-years later, railroads are fighting back to prevent, scale back or delay the implementation of the law. PTC opponents are citing the $13 billion price-tag, which is to be paid almost exclusively by the railroad companies, as “a regulation that imposes a staggering and unjustified burden” on the railroads.

The railroad companies have won over key Republicans including U.S. Rep. John Mica of Florida, chairman of the House Transportation Committee, and U.S. Rep. Bill Shuster, R-Pa., chairman of the railroads subcommittee. Rep. Mica, who, since 2008, has received campaign contributions of $182,298 from railroad lobbyists, is drafting a surface transportation bill which is expected to incorporate the breaks sought by the railroad companies. He also supports “non-technological” safety solutions which would not automatically prevent human errors. Rep. Shuster, who has received $165,800 in campaign contributions from railroad interests since 2008 supports extending the deadline for implementation of PTC by three years and also supports reducing the amount of track to be covered.

Furthermore, to settle a lawsuit filed by the American Association of Railroads, the U.S. Department of Transportation offered to reduce the amount of track that would be required to incorporate PTC by 7,000-14,000 miles, or 10-20%. President Obama’s Secretary of Transportation, Ray LaHood, claimed that the reduction was in line with the President’s goal of streamlining regulation.

A consistent theme in my blog posts is that companies must not be allowed to value money over safety. This is yet another example of highly profitable railroad companies refusing to put the necessary safeguards in place to reduce the likelihood of accidents, unless we the taxpayers subsidize them.

(c) Copyright 2012 Brett A. Emison

Follow @BrettEmison on Twitter.

3 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. Robert Pines says:
    up arrow

    What’s the odds of 5 train rear end collisions all having slow orders? I would think way up there against. The NTSB never mentions PTC in their phoney control your train drivers recommendation.

    http://ohsonline.com/articles/2012/01/16/five-freight-train-collisions-in-2011-prompt-ntsb-to-issue-safety-recommendations-to-fra.aspx

  2. Robert Pines says:
    up arrow

    http://www.bnsf.com/media/spee
    Help me with the math here train crews —the benefit ratio is 22:1 according to Matt Rose–BNSF—
    How does the railroad figure this ratio? $454.5 million for payouts for
    the death and destruction in five years without the proper safety
    equipment which makes it pre-meditated murder I figure or $10 billion
    with the proper safety equipment What about the next 10 years? What
    about the RRs savings/earnings the years before now? Personally I think
    a railroad track television channel would be much better for the people the trains run down like dogs.